Jump to content

Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions.

656 ft long blades? What?


 
2 replies to this topic

#1 Shortpoet-GTD

Shortpoet-GTD

    Shifted

  • Validating
  • 8,025 posts 758 rep

Posted 13 March 2016 - 06:00 AM

It may work but from a layman's mind; it doesn't sound like it will.

Via Los Angeles Times-

http://www.latimes.c...ry.html?ref=yfp


Your thoughts?

#2 eds

eds

    Shifted

  • Global Moderator
  • 3,981 posts 263 rep

Posted 13 March 2016 - 07:25 PM

Vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs) in addition to being
. . . . . . simpler, and
. . . . . . cheaper to build,
. . . have the following advantages:
. . . . . . They are always facing the wind – no need for steering into the wind.
. . . . . . Have greater surface area for energy capture – can be many times greater.
. . . . . . Are more efficient in gusty winds – already facing the gust
. . . . . . Can be installed in more locations – on roofs, along highways, in parking lots.
. . . . . . Do not kill birds and wild – life – slow moving and highly visible.
. . . . . . Can be scaled more easily – from milliwatts to megawatts.
. . . . . . Can be significantly less expensive to build – are inherently simpler .
. . . . . . Can have low maintenance downtime – mechanisms at or near ground level
. . . . . . Produce less noise – low speed means less noise
. . . . . . Are more esthetically pleasing – to some.

3-13-2016 Source:  Vertical wind turbine

#3 Shortpoet-GTD

Shortpoet-GTD

    Shifted

  • Validating
  • 8,025 posts 758 rep

Posted 15 March 2016 - 05:12 PM

Always an optimist; love you for  that.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users