The new proposal by Obama is charging the states with cleaning up their emissions;
with money incentives, rather than the EPA doing all the work on a federal level.
Pro's and con's of this proposal are addressed in this article.
Thoughts?
| Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions. |
0
Proposed EPA rules-aggressive or wimpy?
Started by Shortpoet-GTD, Mar 21 2014 04:23 AM
power plants air quality emissions
1 reply to this topic
#2
Posted 03 May 2014 - 04:26 AM
Update-
the supremes upheld the epa's policies recently.
"By using a modified cap-and-trade system to limit emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide,
the new regulations force states to address the high levels of pollutants which their power plants emit.
The cap will place an upper limit on the level of emissions while a limited number of pollution permits will facilitate trading."
http://www.theclimat...ckle-toxic-air/
the supremes upheld the epa's policies recently.
"By using a modified cap-and-trade system to limit emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide,
the new regulations force states to address the high levels of pollutants which their power plants emit.
The cap will place an upper limit on the level of emissions while a limited number of pollution permits will facilitate trading."
http://www.theclimat...ckle-toxic-air/
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users