“Exxon Dared Critics to Prove It Misled the Public.
. . . Science historian Naomi Oreskes, and
. . . Harvard researcher Geoffrey Supran,
. . . . . . have published an analysis of Exxon Mobil’s climate communications,
. . . . . . that systematically analyze nearly
. . . . . . 40 years of Exxon’s:
. . . . . . . . . scientific research,
. . . . . . . . . reports,
. . . . . . . . . internal documents, and
. . . . . . . . . advertisements, and find
. . . a deep disconnect between how the company directly communicated climate change, and
. . . its internal memos and scientific studies.
“Stranded Assets,”
. . . is a term used to describe assets,
. . . that have become anachronisms,
. . . when faced with new business realities.
Two-thirds of Exxon's shareholders,
. . . voted to force the company to publish an annual report on its climate impacts.
The moment was a rare defiance of Exxon’s management,
. . . which opposed the report, and
. . . maybe a step toward more transparency.
8-24-2017 Source: #climate change: Exxon
Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions. |
1
#climate change: Exxon
Started by eds, Aug 24 2017 04:47 AM
No replies to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users