A recent article in the San Francisco Chronicle explained why rooftop photovoltaic electricity generation is a really good idea for some homeowners.
California's electric rates, kind of high to start with, climb with increasing usage. Use enough more, pay more per kilowatt-hour.
That rate peculiarity, plus subsidies and third-party leasing arrangements make rooftop solar electricity kind of a no-brainer for some homeowners.
See http://www.sfgate.co...ome-4097935.php
| Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions. |
Rooftop photovoltaics a no-brainer for some in California
Started by still learning, Dec 11 2012 06:47 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:47 PM
#2
Posted 17 December 2012 - 01:56 PM
If you install it yourself, it's a no brainer for almost anyone who lives in a state with even modest subsidies.
#3
Posted 17 December 2012 - 06:05 PM
Our usage was very high because of multiple pond pumps that run 24/7, this was putting us in Tier 5 in the SoCalEd billing system, so we certainly considered a photo voltaic system to be a no brainer. After 8 months we seem to be saving about $1,000 a month.
#4
Posted 18 December 2012 - 03:35 PM
Another article in the San Francisco Chronicle explains some other aspects of California's photovoltaic net metering setup.
http://www.sfgate.co...sts-4124277.php
The current setup of the utilities being required to buy electricity from folk's rooftop PV surplus has a cap on it, a cap of 5% of the utilities peak load. That cap has been raised once, a couple of years ago, from 2.5%. http://www.getsolar....ering-cap/3671/
http://www.sfgate.co...sts-4124277.php
The current setup of the utilities being required to buy electricity from folk's rooftop PV surplus has a cap on it, a cap of 5% of the utilities peak load. That cap has been raised once, a couple of years ago, from 2.5%. http://www.getsolar....ering-cap/3671/
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

