| Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions. |
Health Issues
#21
Posted 06 June 2012 - 02:26 PM
#22
Posted 06 June 2012 - 08:03 PM
. . . TV sets, would ruin your eyes, if you watched within 3 feet of the screen.
. . . Cellphones, would give you brain damage, if you used them too much.
. . . Electric overhead transmission wires, curdled cows milk.
. . . The Sun don't always shine, and the wind don't always blow,
. . . . . . but there will always be coal & oil
. . . . . . (even though we haven't figured out how to put it back into the ground yet)
. . . Homes, you need a McMansion and to spend all the equity you have in your mortgage.
. . . Vehicles, you need a Gas-Guzzler, that can pull a boat & trailer (that you can't afford)
. . . . . . up the side of a mountain (that is no where near, where you live).
The older I get, the less credence I put in what people say, and
. . . believe more in what they do.
Everyone that reads this, do one thing for me.
. . . take a walk around your neighborhood, and pick up the trash you see.
. . . It's cheaper than going to a gym,
. . . . . . . bending over to pick up trash is good exercise, and
. . . . . . . it's a lot more rewarding than lifting weights.
That's what I call "Walking the walk," instead of "Talking the talk."
#23
Posted 07 June 2012 - 03:28 AM
That doesn't mean we ban them forever or call them evil.
#24
Posted 11 June 2012 - 02:20 PM
#25
Posted 11 June 2012 - 04:27 PM
#26
Posted 11 June 2012 - 05:11 PM
The other thing this reminds me of is the Salem Witch Trials. Most of the accusers got caught up in all the lovely attention they were getting (to put it simply).
#27
Posted 11 June 2012 - 05:17 PM
It is fear and probably a healthy dose of hypochondria. If these people have symptoms, they are self-induced.elf induced. You can think yourself sick if you try hard enough.
#29
Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:58 AM
Another set of claims about disruptive noise turned out to be the emergency generator at the DPW and not the turbines. Another man's claims were dismissed when his timeframe coincided with the turbines down time.
#31
Posted 13 June 2012 - 05:11 PM
#32
Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:06 PM
Relatively these incidents had very low impacts to communities as compared to the widespread effects of accidents happening on nuclear and hydroelectric power plants.
#33
Posted 13 June 2012 - 11:10 PM
I did see a video of a turbine on fire, YIKES!
#35
Posted 17 June 2012 - 07:37 AM
Shortpoet-GTD, on 07 June 2012 - 03:28 AM, said:
That doesn't mean we ban them forever or call them evil.
The Paw Sox recently hosted a peanut-free event where every hint of peanut contact was seen to before the game. Really.
Is peanut allergy that prevelant? Is it our responsibility to go without in case something might happen to a child?
#36
Posted 17 June 2012 - 11:51 AM
irenen1, on 17 June 2012 - 07:37 AM, said:
The Paw Sox recently hosted a peanut-free event where every hint of peanut contact was seen to before the game. Really.
Is peanut allergy that prevelant? Is it our responsibility to go without in case something might happen to a child?
Not to derail this topic (ok, for a minute) but I wanted to answer this-
http://en.wikipedia..../Peanut_allergy
http://pbskids.org/a..._Allergy_QA.pdf
http://kidshealth.or...ut_allergy.html
Ok, so now we can get back to the health issues of coal. Oh that's right, this rw bs is about turbines, sorry.
#37
Posted 18 June 2012 - 11:45 AM
#38
Posted 18 June 2012 - 01:32 PM
#39
Posted 18 June 2012 - 02:50 PM
#40
Posted 18 June 2012 - 03:03 PM
steph84, on 18 June 2012 - 02:50 PM, said:
A wind turbine? Piece of cake.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

