| Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions. |
The devastating after effects of 3 Gorges Dam
#21
Posted 30 March 2012 - 02:43 PM
"China to flood nature reserve with latest Yangtze dam.
China's Three Gorges Corp. on Thursday marked the beginning of construction for a dam that will flood
the last free-flowing portion of the middle reaches of the Yangtze, the country's longest river.
The 30 billion yuan ($4.75 billion) Xiaonanhai dam is decried by environmentalists because it will flood a nature reserve designed to protect about 40 species of river fish.
Completion of the dam would turn the middle section of the Yangtze into a series of reservoirs,
leaving "no space for fish", said environmentalist Ma Jun, who has been active for over two years in trying to prevent the dam.
"This is the last one, the last section in 2,000 kilometers (1,250 miles) along the Yangtze that was left for endangered
or local fish species. This would be their last habitat," Ma told Reuters.
The Xiaonanhai dam would be the last in a series of 12 dams along the Yangtze, the rest of which are all completed or under construction.
The Three Gorges Dam is the world's biggest power project and was controversial well before it began construction in 1994.
Objections ranged from the destruction of rare species to the flooding of historic towns and displacement of millions
of people, to concerns that it would quickly silt up and lose its efficiency in generating power."
http://www.reuters.c...E82S0GG20120329
#22
Posted 09 May 2012 - 11:12 AM
#23
Posted 10 May 2012 - 06:37 PM
#24
Posted 11 May 2012 - 07:03 PM
I'm curious as to how many people benefited from that lake. What will happen to them if this lake continues eroding? You mentioned fishermen not being able to work. Is this also a water supply source?
I am hoping that with China moving into solar panel production that they will be thinking more in terms of conservation and environmental impact. I have my doubts. I'm not sure the Chinese government thinks that far into the future. They may be more concerned with the financial gains by getting into solar panel production than anything else.
#25
Posted 12 May 2012 - 02:34 AM
#26
Posted 13 May 2012 - 01:56 PM
#27
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:33 AM
artistry, on 13 May 2012 - 01:56 PM, said:
"Air pollution in China is mostly attributed to the use of coal as its main source of energy.
Today, China’s skies are smog-filled, its rivers and coastal areas dark and murky and its citizens, particularly the children
are constantly at risk of dying from asthma and other respiratory diseases.
The beginnings of air pollution in China was during the turn of the 1970s decade.and the ensuing years
thereafter likewise saw the rapid economic success in China.
China is one of top energy users in the world. The country also belongs to the top contributors of global air pollution.
About 656,000 deaths are associated with air pollution, 400,000 of which are premature deaths while respiratory affliction reaches a figure of 20 million annually."
Source
More stats here.
#28
Posted 18 May 2012 - 03:19 AM
the Three Gorges Corporation began preliminary construction work on the Xiaonanhai dam –
a project upriver of the city that Bo had strongly advocated in the face of environmental opposition,
and the last in a series of 12 new dams along the Yangtze river.
Green campaigners were dismayed.
Although some still hold out hope that the construction can be halted, many fear that the dam will ruin a crucial
reserve for rare and endangered fish species, including the Chinese paddlefish and the Yangtze sturgeon
– a "living fossil" that has survived since the time of the dinosaurs.
The construction work "basically means a death sentence for these endangered species", said Chang Cheng,
a campaigner for Friends of Nature (FON), China's oldest NGO."
Source
And how many people/towns will be relocated or lost entirely?
#29
Posted 18 May 2012 - 10:57 AM
I understand that they are wanting to get away from using coal but there are other ways to do it than this. They just seemed determined that this dam was the only way. I am not sure they even considered any other options.
#30
Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:28 PM
dissn_it, on 18 May 2012 - 10:57 AM, said:
I understand that they are wanting to get away from using coal but there are other ways to do it than this. They just seemed determined that this dam was the only way. I am not sure they even considered any other options.
#31
Posted 19 May 2012 - 10:44 AM
#32
Posted 21 May 2012 - 07:54 PM
Ye Xuchun told the paper that the dam 500 kilometers upstream has dramatically reduced flow levels on the Yangtze River, which is linked to the lake." I really hope that there are independent researchers on this and not some government appointed team.
#33
Posted 22 May 2012 - 03:21 AM
"Twelve hundred years
of low water marks on the river were recorded in the inscriptions and the carvings of carp at Baiheliang,
now submerged.
The Yangtze River is important to the cultural origins of southern China.
Human activity was found in the Three Gorges area as far back as 27 thousand years ago."
Source
Related
#34
Posted 26 May 2012 - 02:44 AM
So busy to get through that building stage that they don't or can't care about the environment.
If you look back at western cultures we pretty much ruined landscapes until...the early 20th century? I'm not sure.
But I can understand if not like why china is acting how it is.
#35
Posted 07 June 2012 - 05:56 PM
#36
Posted 08 June 2012 - 03:50 AM
Isabellas2007, on 07 June 2012 - 05:56 PM, said:
wouldn't work in the cities anyway.
(Similar to the gop's way of thinking-yoyo. You're on your own.)
#37
Posted 23 January 2013 - 05:49 AM
article, it is moving forward; damn the consequences.
Reuters-Source
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
